Understanding Group Dynamics and Typology of Youth Travelers: A Comprehensive Study on Travel Preferences and Roles at Destination
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17509/jithor.v6i1.57537Keywords:
Youth Travelers, Tourist Typology, Travel Preferences, Group TravelAbstract
This research explores the group dynamics and typology of young travelers, classifying them into four distinct types: Leaders, Followers, Clowns, and Loners. Leaders assume responsibility for group decision-making and itinerary management, often prioritizing group comfort over personal enjoyment. Followers comply with group decisions and adapt their preferences to align with collective choices. Clowns, serving as group entertainers, contribute to a positive atmosphere, while Loners prefer solitude, engaging in personal activities even within the group context. The research highlights the concept of a "collective bubble," a combination of physical and psychological factors that contribute to an enjoyable group travel experience. Several factors contributing to unpleasant group travel experiences were also identified, including inadequate planning time, excessive anxiety, personal issues between group members, significant differences in personal preferences, unexpected events like illness, and comparisons with other groups' experiences. The findings underscore the importance of understanding the typologies and dynamics of youth travelers in creating satisfying group travel experiences. The roles played by different traveler types and effective compromise among group members emerge as key factors for enjoyable group travel. The study provides valuable insights for organizers and participants of group travel, contributing to the literature on youth tourism and group dynamics.
References
Alves, P., Martins, H., Saraiva, P., Carneiro, J., Novais, P., & Marreiros, G. (2023). Group recommender systems for tourism: how does personality predict preferences for attractions, travel motivations, preferences and concerns? User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 33(5), 1141-1210.
Apostolou, M., Keramari, D., Kagialis, A., & Sullman, M. (2021). Why people make friends: The nature of friendship. Personal Relationships, 28(1), 4-18.
Freitas, M., Santos, A. J., Ribeiro, O., Pimenta, M., & Rubin, K. H. (2018). Friendship quality in adolescence and social adjustment in the peer group. Análise Psicológica, 36(2), 219-234.
Heimtum, B., & Jordan, F. (2011). 'Wish YOU Weren't Here!': Interpersonal Conflicts and the Touristic Experiences of Norwegian and British Women Travelling with Friends. Tourist Studies, 11(3), 271 –290.
Hui, H. (1988). Measurement of Individualism-Collectivism. Journal of Research in Personality, 22(1), 17- 36.
Jaakson, R. (2004). Beyond The Tourist Bubble? Annals of Tourism Research, 31(1), 44–60.
Juretić, J. (2018). Quality of close relationships and emotional regulation regarding social anxiety. Psychiatria Danubina, 30(4), 441-451.
Kovačić, S., Mărgărint, M. C., Ionce, R., & Miljković, Đ. (2020). What are the factors affecting tourist behavior based on the perception of risk? Romanian and Serbian tourists’ perspective in the aftermath of the recent floods and wildfires in Greece. Sustainability, 12(16), 6310.
Langston, C. A., & Nancy, C. (1989). Social anxiety and social constraint: When making friends is hard. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(4), 649-661.
Liechty, T., Nuno, F.R., & Careen, M.Y. (2009). "I traveled alone, but never felt alone": an exploration of the benefits of an older women's group tour experience. Tourism Review International, 13, 17–29.
Mathieson, K., & Banerjee, R. (2011). Peer play, emotion understanding, and socio-moral explanation: The role of gender. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 188-196.
Mjaavatn, P. E., & Frostad, P. (2016). Adolescents: Differences in friendship patterns related to gender. Issues in Educational Research, 26(1), 45- 64.
Morone, A., Morone, P., & Germani, A. R. (2014). Individual and group behaviour in the traveler’s dilemma: An experimental study. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 49, 1–7.
Njagi, C. W., Ndivo, R. M., & Manyara, G. (2017). Understanding the travel motivation among youth travelers in Kenya: the 'push' and 'pull' paradigm. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 10(2), 1- 16.
Prasad, S., Nair, K., & Purohit, H. (2019). Tourist satisfaction: an analysis of push and pull factors-a case of Qatar tourism. Journal of Management (JOM), 6(2), 187-199.
Różycki, P., & Korbiel, K. (2022). The theoretical concept of tourist typology in the interdisciplinary structure of tourism. Sport and Tourism Central European Journal, 5(3), 141-157.
Sari, D., Kusumah, A. H. G., & Marhanah, S. (2018). Analisis faktor motivasi wisatawan muda dalam mengunjungi destinasi wisata minat khusus. Journal of Indonesian Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, 1(2), 11-22.
Schulman, S. (1993). Close Friendships in Early and Middle Adolescence: Typology and Friendship Reasoning. New Directions for Child Development, 1993(60), 55 - 71.
Thurnell-Read, T. (2012). What Happens on Tour: The Premarital Stag Tour, Homosocial Bonding, and Male Friendship? Men and Masculinities 15(3), 249-270.
Wang, K., Chen, J.S., & Chou, S. (2007). Senior Tourists' Purchasing Decisions in Group Package Tour. Anatoiia: An international Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 18(1), 23-42.
Wentzel, K. R., & Erdley, C. A. (1993). Strategies for making friends: Relations to social behavior and peer acceptance in early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 29(5), 819-826.
Wong, S., & Lau, E. (2014). Understanding the Behavior of Hong Kong Chinese Tourists on Group Tour Packages. Journal of Travel Research, 40(1), 57-67.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ahmad Hudaiby Galih Kusumah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.













